06 3012405004818 Ciaco scrl onixsuitesupport@onixsuite.com 20260421 eng

COM.ONIXSUITE.9782875587503 03 02 i6doc 01 SKU 97673PDF 02 2875587501 03 9782875587503 15 9782875587503 DG 002 01 GCOI 28001106069600 01 GCOI 29303100617670 1 B15 Ilaria Caloi Caloi, Ilaria Ilaria Caloi 2 B15 Charlotte Langohr Langohr, Charlotte Charlotte Langohr Archéologue Université catholique de Louvain 01 eng SOC002010 HDDK 29 2012 3118 homme et environnement 10 SOC003000 24 Anthropologie 24 Archéologie 01 06 01 <p>This volume comprises the proceedings of a workshop with the same title which took place in February 2016 at UCLouvain (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). It was organised within the framework of the ARC13/18-049 (concerted research action) "A World in Crisis?". This workshop questioned the reliability of pottery as crisis indicator within the archaeological data set. More particularly, following the perspective of archaeological and anthropological research that assesses pottery technology as a social product, there is an interest in addressing the social and cultural aspects of technological change in pottery production in the specifi c context of crisis and period of trouble. The main goal of our examination was to detect whether and how technological choices or changes observed in the archaeological ceramic record may refl ect periods of transition, disruption, crisis or change pertaining to social, political, economic and environmental conditions. We proposed to address these questions by bringing together experts in charge of the study of pottery at diff erent Bronze Age Mediterranean sites in order to discuss, confront and contextualise their respective assemblages and associated contexts.<br /> This two-day workshop emphasised that the majority of our case studies allow the identifi cation of continuous changes in pottery production systems, i.e. changes that do not evidence any clear cessation of transmission in potting practices. These are interpreted as indicators of periods of transition, of socio-political and economic transformation, rather than moments of crisis or disruption. On the contrary, discontinuous changes in pottery production systems have been observed in those contexts where new paste recipes and/or innovative forming techniques were introduced by foreigners and adopted by local people. Finally, the contributions also highlighted that our observations needed to be replaced in a broader contextual framework, especially in the case of the Late Bronze Age (13th-12th c. BC ) Mediterranean systems' collapse. Indeed, several archaeological contexts here examined have demonstrated a relative continuity of ceramic traditions at the 13th-12th c. BC transition, while other forms of transmitted technological knowledge had abruptly stopped.</p> 03 <p>This volume comprises the proceedings of a workshop with the same title which took place in February 2016 at UCLouvain (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). It was organised within the framework of the ARC13/18-049 (concerted research action) "A World in Crisis?". This workshop questioned the reliability of pottery as crisis indicator within the archaeological data set. More particularly, following the perspective of archaeological and anthropological research that assesses pottery technology as a social product, there is an interest in addressing the social and cultural aspects of technological change in pottery production in the specifi c context of crisis and period of trouble. The main goal of our examination was to detect whether and how technological choices or changes observed in the archaeological ceramic record may refl ect periods of transition, disruption, crisis or change pertaining to social, political, economic and environmental conditions. We proposed to address these questions by bringing together experts in charge of the study of pottery at diff erent Bronze Age Mediterranean sites in order to discuss, confront and contextualise their respective assemblages and associated contexts.<br /> This two-day workshop emphasised that the majority of our case studies allow the identifi cation of continuous changes in pottery production systems, i.e. changes that do not evidence any clear cessation of transmission in potting practices. These are interpreted as indicators of periods of transition, of socio-political and economic transformation, rather than moments of crisis or disruption. On the contrary, discontinuous changes in pottery production systems have been observed in those contexts where new paste recipes and/or innovative forming techniques were introduced by foreigners and adopted by local people. Finally, the contributions also highlighted that our observations needed to be replaced in a broader contextual framework, especially in the case of the Late Bronze Age (13th-12th c. BC ) Mediterranean systems' collapse. Indeed, several archaeological contexts here examined have demonstrated a relative continuity of ceramic traditions at the 13th-12th c. BC transition, while other forms of transmitted technological knowledge had abruptly stopped.</p> 02 This workshop questioned the reliability of pottery as crisis indicator within the archaeological data set. More particularly, following the perspective of archaeological and anthropological research that assesses pottery technology as a social product, there is an interest in addressing the social and cultural aspects of technological change... 01 <p>This volume comprises the proceedings of a workshop with the same title which took place in February 2016 at UCLouvain (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). It was organised within the framework of the ARC13/18-049 (concerted research action) "A World in Crisis?". This workshop questioned the reliability of pottery as crisis indicator within the archaeological data set. More particularly, following the perspective of archaeological and anthropological research that assesses pottery technology as a social product, there is an interest in addressing the social and cultural aspects of technological change in pottery production in the specifi c context of crisis and period of trouble. The main goal of our examination was to detect whether and how technological choices or changes observed in the archaeological ceramic record may refl ect periods of transition, disruption, crisis or change pertaining to social, political, economic and environmental conditions. We proposed to address these questions by bringing together experts in charge of the study of pottery at diff erent Bronze Age Mediterranean sites in order to discuss, confront and contextualise their respective assemblages and associated contexts.<br /> This two-day workshop emphasised that the majority of our case studies allow the identifi cation of continuous changes in pottery production systems, i.e. changes that do not evidence any clear cessation of transmission in potting practices. These are interpreted as indicators of periods of transition, of socio-political and economic transformation, rather than moments of crisis or disruption. On the contrary, discontinuous changes in pottery production systems have been observed in those contexts where new paste recipes and/or innovative forming techniques were introduced by foreigners and adopted by local people. Finally, the contributions also highlighted that our observations needed to be replaced in a broader contextual framework, especially in the case of the Late Bronze Age (13th-12th c. BC ) Mediterranean systems' collapse. Indeed, several archaeological contexts here examined have demonstrated a relative continuity of ceramic traditions at the 13th-12th c. BC transition, while other forms of transmitted technological knowledge had abruptly stopped.</p> 03 <p>This volume comprises the proceedings of a workshop with the same title which took place in February 2016 at UCLouvain (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). It was organised within the framework of the ARC13/18-049 (concerted research action) "A World in Crisis?". This workshop questioned the reliability of pottery as crisis indicator within the archaeological data set. More particularly, following the perspective of archaeological and anthropological research that assesses pottery technology as a social product, there is an interest in addressing the social and cultural aspects of technological change in pottery production in the specifi c context of crisis and period of trouble. The main goal of our examination was to detect whether and how technological choices or changes observed in the archaeological ceramic record may refl ect periods of transition, disruption, crisis or change pertaining to social, political, economic and environmental conditions. We proposed to address these questions by bringing together experts in charge of the study of pottery at diff erent Bronze Age Mediterranean sites in order to discuss, confront and contextualise their respective assemblages and associated contexts.<br /> This two-day workshop emphasised that the majority of our case studies allow the identifi cation of continuous changes in pottery production systems, i.e. changes that do not evidence any clear cessation of transmission in potting practices. These are interpreted as indicators of periods of transition, of socio-political and economic transformation, rather than moments of crisis or disruption. On the contrary, discontinuous changes in pottery production systems have been observed in those contexts where new paste recipes and/or innovative forming techniques were introduced by foreigners and adopted by local people. Finally, the contributions also highlighted that our observations needed to be replaced in a broader contextual framework, especially in the case of the Late Bronze Age (13th-12th c. BC ) Mediterranean systems' collapse. Indeed, several archaeological contexts here examined have demonstrated a relative continuity of ceramic traditions at the 13th-12th c. BC transition, while other forms of transmitted technological knowledge had abruptly stopped.</p> 02 This workshop questioned the reliability of pottery as crisis indicator within the archaeological data set. More particularly, following the perspective of archaeological and anthropological research that assesses pottery technology as a social product, there is an interest in addressing the social and cultural aspects of technological change... 04 <p>1. Technological changes in ceramic production during periods of trouble 21<br /> Methodological approaches and matters of scale<br /> Ilaria Caloi<br /> Charlotte Langohr<br /> 2. Firing structures and transition periods in Rajasthan (India, 2005-2015) 35<br /> Valentine Roux<br /> Simone Gabbriellini<br /> 3. Craft behaviours during a period of transformations 45<br /> The introduction and adoption of the potter's wheel in Central Greece during Early Bronze Age<br /> Maria Choleva<br /> 4. The times they are A-changin' 75<br /> Pottery production and technological change at Mochlos in the earlier Prepalatial period<br /> Thomas M. Brogan<br /> Luke Kaiser<br /> Eleni Nodarou<br /> The contribution of pottery<br /> Ina Berg<br /> 6. Change and continuity in the pottery tradition at Kontopigado, Alimos, during the late 13th<br /> and the early 12th c. BC 111<br /> Elina Kardamaki<br /> Konstantina Kaza-Papageorgiou<br /> 7. Hand-made pottery groups in Mainland Greece during the 13th and 12th c. BC as a sign of<br /> 8. The troubled century? 151<br /> Potting practices and socio-political changes at Mitrou, East Lokris, between the end of the 14th<br /> and the beginning of the 12th c. BC<br /> Salvatore Vitale<br /> 12th c. BC transition<br /> Artemis Georgiou<br /> 10. Local and imported pottery in the Southern Levant during the 13th-12th c. BC 201<br /> Exploring through the 'crisis’ years<br /> David Ben-Shlomo<br /> 11. Crisis years and pottery systems 217   <br /> Marco Bettelli<br /> Elisabetta Borgna<br /> Sara T. Levi</p> 43 La collection AEGIS, associée au groupe de recherches Aegean Interdisciplinary Studies (CEMA-INCA-UCL),met à la disposition des scientifiques et des amateurs éclairés l'état des lieux de la recherche en matière d'archéologie du monde égéen et minoen. 44 <p>La collection AEGIS, associée au groupe de recherches Aegean Interdisciplinary Studies (CEMA-INCA-UCL),met à la disposition des scientifiques et des amateurs éclairés l'état des lieux de la recherche en matière d'archéologie du monde égéen et minoen en particulier. Monographies, thèses, actes de colloques etrapports de fouilles se complètent pour offrir une vue d'ensemble de cet espace-temps capital pourla compréhension de la Préhistoire en Méditerranée et de ses prolongements historiques, politiques,culturels, symboliques et sociaux.</p> 06 03 01 https://i6doc.com/resources/titles/28001106069600/images/92c4661685bf6681f6a33b78ef729658/HIGHQ/9782875587503.jpg 20190208 07 03 01 https://i6doc.com/resources/titles/28001106069600/images/92c4661685bf6681f6a33b78ef729658/THUMBNAIL/9782875587503.jpg 20190208 11 01 https://pul.uclouvain.be/resources/collections/56/images/56L.gif 17 03 01 https://i6doc.com/resources/publishers/35.jpg 18 09 01 https://i6doc.com/resources/publishers/73.png 38 https://i6doc.com/en/book/?GCOI=28001106069600 06 3052405007518 Presses universitaires de Louvain 01 06 3052405007518 Presses universitaires de Louvain 01 Presses universitaires de Louvain http://pul.uclouvain.be/ Louvain-la-Neuve BE 04 20190208 2019 01 WORLD 06 03 9782875587497