06 3012405004818 Ciaco scrl onixsuitesupport@onixsuite.com 20260313 eng

COM.ONIXSUITE.9782802805397 03 02 i6doc 01 SKU 108665PDF 02 2802805398 03 9782802805397 15 9782802805397 DG 1 002 01 GCOI 28001100237930 1 B01 Denis Duez Duez, Denis Denis Duez 2 B01 Cecilia Rizcallah Rizcallah, Cecilia Cecilia Rizcallah 1 01 eng LAW000000 L 29 2012 3259 DROIT 10 REF000000 12 G 24 INTERNET Droit 24 INTERNET Droit européen 29 juillet 2013 3801 OUVRAGES DE DOCUMENTATION 01 <p>At its core, the volume seeks to engage with a pressing question: does the EU truly amplify the voices of the marginalized—or, more pointedly, the voiceless? Emerging from the Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence "Un-Muting Europe," this collection brings together fresh perspectives from early-career scholars across disciplines and borders. Through a diverse set of case studies— ranging from environmental justice and migration to democratic backsliding and digital rights—it critically examines how EU institutions interact with those historically silenced, including stateless individuals, minority groups, future generations, and even non-human entities. Adopting a sharp interdisciplinary lens, the book moves beyond institutional<br /> rhetoric to question whether the EU's discourse of participation and protection translates into tangible outcomes. Does the European Union function as a genuine platform for empowerment due to its unique institutional architecture—or does it, paradoxically, contribute to the very silencing it seeks to prevent? Timely and thought-provoking, this volume is essential reading for anyone interested in the legitimacy of European governance, the politics of voice and silence, and the future of rights protection in the EU.</p> 03 <p>At its core, the volume seeks to engage with a pressing question: does the EU truly amplify the voices of the marginalized—or, more pointedly, the voiceless? Emerging from the Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence "Un-Muting Europe," this collection brings together fresh perspectives from early-career scholars across disciplines and borders. Through a diverse set of case studies— ranging from environmental justice and migration to democratic backsliding and digital rights—it critically examines how EU institutions interact with those historically silenced, including stateless individuals, minority groups, future generations, and even non-human entities. Adopting a sharp interdisciplinary lens, the book moves beyond institutional<br /> rhetoric to question whether the EU's discourse of participation and protection translates into tangible outcomes. Does the European Union function as a genuine platform for empowerment due to its unique institutional architecture—or does it, paradoxically, contribute to the very silencing it seeks to prevent? Timely and thought-provoking, this volume is essential reading for anyone interested in the legitimacy of European governance, the politics of voice and silence, and the future of rights protection in the EU.</p> 02 In an era marked by a crisis of liberal values—notably within Europe—and mounting challenges to fundamental rights, Standing Up for the Voiceless? explores the European Union's evolving role in fostering political inclusion. 01 <p>At its core, the volume seeks to engage with a pressing question: does the EU truly amplify the voices of the marginalized—or, more pointedly, the voiceless? Emerging from the Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence "Un-Muting Europe," this collection brings together fresh perspectives from early-career scholars across disciplines and borders. Through a diverse set of case studies— ranging from environmental justice and migration to democratic backsliding and digital rights—it critically examines how EU institutions interact with those historically silenced, including stateless individuals, minority groups, future generations, and even non-human entities. Adopting a sharp interdisciplinary lens, the book moves beyond institutional<br /> rhetoric to question whether the EU's discourse of participation and protection translates into tangible outcomes. Does the European Union function as a genuine platform for empowerment due to its unique institutional architecture—or does it, paradoxically, contribute to the very silencing it seeks to prevent? Timely and thought-provoking, this volume is essential reading for anyone interested in the legitimacy of European governance, the politics of voice and silence, and the future of rights protection in the EU.</p> 03 <p>At its core, the volume seeks to engage with a pressing question: does the EU truly amplify the voices of the marginalized—or, more pointedly, the voiceless? Emerging from the Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence "Un-Muting Europe," this collection brings together fresh perspectives from early-career scholars across disciplines and borders. Through a diverse set of case studies— ranging from environmental justice and migration to democratic backsliding and digital rights—it critically examines how EU institutions interact with those historically silenced, including stateless individuals, minority groups, future generations, and even non-human entities. Adopting a sharp interdisciplinary lens, the book moves beyond institutional<br /> rhetoric to question whether the EU's discourse of participation and protection translates into tangible outcomes. Does the European Union function as a genuine platform for empowerment due to its unique institutional architecture—or does it, paradoxically, contribute to the very silencing it seeks to prevent? Timely and thought-provoking, this volume is essential reading for anyone interested in the legitimacy of European governance, the politics of voice and silence, and the future of rights protection in the EU.</p> 02 In an era marked by a crisis of liberal values—notably within Europe—and mounting challenges to fundamental rights, Standing Up for the Voiceless? explores the European Union's evolving role in fostering political inclusion. 04 <p>Standing up for the voiceless? Exploring the EU's capacityfor rights protection. An introduction<br /> Denis Duez & Cecilia Rizcallah</p> <p>1. Standing up for the voiceless: an analytical framework 7<br /> 1.1. The classical democratic model and its limitations 7<br /> 1.2. Giving a voice to the voiceless: the rise of the EUunmuting narrative 10<br /> 1.3. Voicelessness: a new research agenda 13</p> <p>2. Structure of the book 19</p> <p>Defining the green to make environmental concerns heard in the EU?<br /> The legal consequences of the (unexpected) uses of the taxonomy<br /> Norman Vander Putten 23</p> <p>1. Taxonomising the contribution or harm to environmental<br /> protection in the European Union 28<br /> 1.1. The Taxonomy Regulation unpacked 29<br /> 1.2. Incidental taxonomies in the Recovery and Resilience<br /> Facility, the Green Bonds Regulation and the GreenBudgeting Framework 32<br /> 1.2.1. The Recovery and Resilience Facility 32<br /> 1.2.2. The Green Bonds Regulation 34<br /> 1.2.3. The Green Budgeting Initiative 35</p> <p>2. Taxonomies as the relatively unexpected component of risingselective industrial action 37<br /> 2.1. The Taxonomy confronted with a rising environmentalgovernance through spending 37<br /> 2.2. Rethinking the legitimacy and legality of delegated actsconsidering the taxonomy’s uses 41<br /> Conclusion 44<br /> <br /> Unmuting the environment in EU competition law – Broadeningthe notion of "fair share to consumers" when assessing<br /> sustainable cooperation initiatives<br /> Tom Buytaert 47</p> <p>1. What the new EU Commission’s guidelines on cooperationagreements foresee – A (modest) evolution 52<br /> 1.1. The main principles of the sustainabilitychapter of the Guidelines 52<br /> 1.2. Art. 101(3) TFEU – the “fair share to consumers”requirement in particular 54</p> <p>2. What the EU guidelines could (or should) have foreseen 58<br /> 2.1. More ambitious national approaches 59<br /> 2.1.1. The example of the Netherlands 59<br /> 2.1.2. The example of Austria 62<br /> 2.1.3. The example of the UK 63<br /> 2.2. (Further) unmuting consumers (citizens)in the Commission’s Guidelines 65<br /> 2.2.1. The CJEU case-law does not stand in the way of(further) greening EU competition policy 65<br /> 2.2.2. The (constitutional) need to consider broadsustainability interests in the analysis frameworkunder Article 101(3) TFEU 67<br /> 2.2.3. The requirement for companies to “collaborate”in order to meet their corporate sustainabilitydue diligence obligations 69<br /> Conclusion 71</p> <p>Which voices are heard in European wildlifepolicy? The necessity to listen to the many voices ofliving beings affected by conservation project<br /> Arnaud Gane 73</p> <p>1. A legislation trying to unmute nature in the tension ofenvironmental productivity interests 78<br /> 1.1. History of European legislation on biodiversity:ambitions thwarted by the primacy of economic interests 79<br /> 1.2. The failure of the Green Deal to act on the majorimpact of agriculture on European nature symbolized by the<br /> destiny of the “Farm to Fork” legislation 82<br /> 1.3. The Green Deal difficult attempts to change the legalperception of nature, represented by the complicatedlegislative process of the Nature Restoration Law 85</p> <p>2. Rewilding as the most de-anthropized conservation practice,but with a potential muting effect on the other human groups concerned 88<br /> 2.1. Rewilding beyond restoration: the autonomy of wildnature as an ideal of the unmuting of nature 88<br /> 2.2. Vercors Vie Sauvage case study: how a rewildingproject can affect local communities and reinforce their<br /> feeling of being muted 92<br /> Conclusion 95</p> <p>Calling for coherence: Analysing the protectionof environmental defenders in the European Green Deal<br /> Amanda Kron 97</p> <p>1. Just transition in international law and the European Green Deal 100<br /> 1.1. Just transition 100<br /> 1.2. The European Green Deal 101</p> <p>2. Environmental defenders 102<br /> 2.1. Framings by UN human rights mechanisms 103<br /> 2.2. Aarhus Convention 105<br /> 2.3. European Network on National Human RightsInstitutions (ENNHRI) 106<br /> 2.4. European Court of Justice 107<br /> 2.5. European Court of Human Rights 108<br /> 2.6. Other regulations, directives and EU policies 109<br /> 2.7. Concluding analysis: International law and the EU 111</p> <p>3. Environmental defenders and the European Green Deal 111<br /> 3.1. Taxonomy Regulation 112<br /> 3.2. EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive 113<br /> Concluding analysis 116</p> <p>Citizenship against democracy? Consequences of un-muting<br /> Hungarians beyond the borders on the EU’s rule of law crisis<br /> Anita Kovacs 119</p> <p>1. The case of Hungarians beyond the borders: three pillars of<br /> electoral autocracy 120<br /> <br /> 1.1. Preferential naturalisation for a new category of supporters 121<br /> 1.2. Muted dissent and amplified consent within the electoral system 124<br /> 1.2.1. Differential treatment based on physical presence in thecountry, ethnic background, and country of residence 127<br /> 1.2.2. Effects of discrimination favouring ethnic Hungariansagainst dissidents 130<br /> 1.2.3. Low representativity of the will of the people 135<br /> 1.3. Additional benefits as insurance for pocketing votes 137</p> <p>2. The EU’s limited capacity to interfere with prerogativesreserved for Member States 139<br /> 2.1. EU citizenship: no grip on acquisition rules 139<br /> 2.2. Democracy: no common conceptiondespite the rule of law connection 141<br /> 2.3. Non-discrimination in fundamental rights: lack ofproper instruments 143<br /> 2.4. Non-discrimination in economic freedoms: limitedscope of EU law regarding travel benefits 144<br /> Concluding remarks 146</p> <p>Article 10(3) TEU: Unlocking untapped potentialto safeguard muted citizens’democratic rights<br /> Timothée Ceurremans & Elisabeth David 147</p> <p>1. Article 10(3) TEU: A remedy against illiberalism? 150<br /> 1.1. Operationalizing the value of democracy 150<br /> 1.2. Why Article 10(3), first sentence, TEU? 151<br /> 1.3. Type and nature of obligations 153<br /> 1.4. Direct effect of Article 10(3) TEU 153<br /> 1.5. Limits: Systemic deficiencies, national identity and theprinciple of conferral 154</p> <p>2. The preliminary reference mechanism: Opportunities andchallenges for strategic litigation on the basis of Article 10(3) TEU 155<br /> 2.1. Opportunities 155<br /> 2.2. Challenges 157</p> <p>3. Unmuting in the context of the EU: Legal mobilization,transformative constitutionalism and value-enforcement<br /> through the EU citizen 160<br /> 3.1. Legal mobilization by individuals or groups 160<br /> 3.2. The institutional condition for successful legalmobilization: Transformative constitutionalism in Kirchberg 161<br /> 3.3. The EU citizen as central actor in the EU’s compositedemocracy: Remedial participatory democracy 163<br /> 3.4. The Haves and Have-nots: EU actors in a skewed system 166<br /> 3.5. The EU citizen and the Member State on the OS-RP spectrum 167<br /> Conclusion 169</p> <p>From passivity to empowerment of the European patientin the light of new digital challenges<br /> Tiphaine Maloingne 171</p> <p>1. The moderna tale of David against Goliath 174<br /> 1.1. Genesis of inequality: the inevitable struggle for data protection 174<br /> 1.2. Reinforcement of inequality: the patient’s vulnerabilityfacing health data protection 177</p> <p>2. Reversing the tale of David against Goliath: A Europeanpatient granted with voice and rights 179<br /> 2.1. Premises of a voice: a diversity of actions in favor ofthe European patient 180<br /> 2.2. A European patient empowered: a toolbox of digitalfundamental rights 183</p> <p>3. A patient prone to empowerment: a gradual inclusion in thelegislative process 186<br /> 3.1. A patient empowered and heard on a micro level 186<br /> 3.2. A patient empowered and heard on a macro level 188<br /> Concluding remarks 191</p> <p>Silencing falsehoods: Enhancing the EU’s unmuting<br /> power trough tackling gendered disinformation<br /> Valentina Golunova 193</p> <p>1. The “unmuting” narrative in the EU’s digital policy 197<br /> 2. Critical appraisal of the EU’s regulatory measures on gendered<br /> disinformation 201<br /> 2.1. Legal instruments applicable to gendered disinformation 202<br /> 2.2. Mechanisms for addressing gendered disinformation 203<br /> 2.3. Remedies available to victims of gendered disinformation 208<br /> Conclusion 211<br /> <br /> From silence to empowerment: Rethinking the EU’s legal<br /> response to hate speech<br /> Stevi Kitsou 213</p> <p>Introduction 213</p> <p>1. Understanding Hate Speech: Societal and legal perspectives 217</p> <p>2. Addressing hate speech speech within the Council of Europe 220</p> <p>3. Combating hate speech in the EU 224<br /> 3.1. The Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA on<br /> combatting certain forms and expressions of racism and<br /> xenophobia by the means of criminal law 226<br /> 3.2. The Audiovisual Media Services Directive 230<br /> 3.3. The Code of Conduct on Countering illegal Hate<br /> speech Online under the e-Commerce Directive and the<br /> Digital Services Act 231<br /> 3.4. Extending the list of EU crimes in Article 83 TFEU to<br /> hate speech and hate crime 234</p> <p>4. Towards a coherent EU Approach to regulating hate speech 238<br /> Conclusion 243</p> <p>The identification of obligations under EU law: tools that canbe used by relocated persons to voice their interests?<br /> Zoé Briard 245</p> <p>1. Relocated individuals in the EU: silenced by the lack of recognition 248<br /> 1.1. The existence of processes of planned relocationsrelated to climate change in Europe, the examples of the<br /> Danube floodplains in Austria and the Simbach torrent in Germany 249<br /> 1.2. The challenges faced to be recognized as relocatedpersons and the consequent muting effect of this situation 251<br /> 1.3. The EU’s position regarding planned relocations andclimate mobilities 253</p> <p>2. Planned relocations and human rights: promising and yetunconvincing solutions at the EU level 255<br /> 2.1. The right to life (Article 2 of the EU Charter andArticle 2 of the ECHR) 256<br /> 2.2. The freedom of movement (Article 45 of the EU Charter) 258<br /> 2.3. The right to property (Article 17 of the EU Charter) 259<br /> 2.4. The right to respect for private and family life<br /> (Article 7 of the EU Charter and Article 8 of the ECHR) 260<br /> <br /> 3. The Water Framework Directive and the EU Floods Directive,an invitation for a more in-depth analysis of EU law to voice theinterests of persons relocated 261<br /> Conclusion 262</p> <p>The refugee resettlement selection process: The new Europeanframework as a gamechanger in giving voice to refugees<br /> Caroline Leclercq 265</p> <p>1. The new EU resettlement framework: A “common procedureunder an EU regulation” 269<br /> 1.1. EU priorities 269<br /> 1.2. Admission procedure 270<br /> 1.3. Procedural aspects 273<br /> 1.4. Other actors 275</p> <p>2. Does the new EU resettlement framework contribute to“unmute” refugees? 275<br /> 2.1. Access to resettlement and expression of refugee’s<br /> concerns: Content of the regulation 276<br /> 2.2. Effective protection of refugees’ fundamental right: EU<br /> Charter of fundamental rights 279<br /> Conclusion 283</p> 06 03 01 https://i6doc.com/resources/titles/28001100237930/images/f152516615efd05cf4b4903b03d4a45d/HIGHQ/9782802805397.jpg 20250623 07 03 01 https://i6doc.com/resources/titles/28001100237930/images/f152516615efd05cf4b4903b03d4a45d/THUMBNAIL/9782802805397.jpg 20250623 17 09 01 https://i6doc.com/resources/publishers/34.png 18 09 01 https://i6doc.com/resources/publishers/243.png 38 https://i6doc.com/en/book/?GCOI=28001100237930 Presses universitaires Saint-Louis Bruxelles 01 02 Dilicom PUSAINTLOUIS Presses universitaires Saint-Louis Bruxelles 04 20250623 2025 02 WORLD